[[ [2001-02-12, 00.41-00.50] Transcribed by zrajm [2003-01-28] added file header Style: {}=bold, <>=italic, paginated Type: article Date: September 1994 Title: {chuvmey} Author: Lawrence M. Schoen (?) Source: <{HolQeD} 3:3>, page 20 Publisher: Klingon Language Institute, Flourtown, PA, ISSN 1061-2327 Summary: : "{chuvmey}", from <{HolQeD} 3:3>, page 20 : Article by Lawrence M. Schoen (?), 1994 : Klingon Language Institute, Flourtown, PA : ISSN 1061-2327 ]][[p.20]] {chuvmey} Talking with Marc Okrand it's difficult to stay focused on a narrow point of grammal; other bits and pieces of {tlhIngan Hol} lore crept in here and there during an hour long chat, snippets which didn't quite lend themselves to the interview on {-ghach}, as definitive a case of leftovers as one could imagine. Those mystery words from can be revealed at last. is {ngagh}, and is actually {lItHa'} And finally, somewhat back on the target: the origin of {-ghach}. It all stems from poor Worf's fate, his decision to take on the . Having the verb {naD} making {naDHa'} was simple enough, but what to do for a nominal form? Enter the ever-popular {-ghach}! But we can't blame Worf, or even his father, for as we all know Mogh was a traitor. If you want to blame {-ghach} on someone, blame the house of Duras. [[eof]]