[[ [2016-10-03] added document Type: email Date: 2011-11-15 Title: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] learnings from Saarbrücken {qepHom'a'} Author: Lieven L. Litaer (describing conversation with Marc Okrand) Summary: Marc Okrand says that there's no equivalent to “be full/satisfied”, but that one can use {ghungHa'} ~not be hungry any more~ and {'ojHa'} ~not be thirsty any more.~ ]] Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:02:40 +0100 From: Lieven Litaer To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] learnings from Saarbrücken qepHom'a' ja' De'vID: > refers not just to food, but anything consumed for sustenance > (i.e., "food" in a more general sense than "solid food") Talking about food, no new word, but an interesting explanation: I asked if there were a word for "satisfied", "I'm full", i.e. you had eaten enough. MO said no, but accepted {ghungHa'} for "not hungry any more". You cannot use it though to say that you are not hungry, that should be {ghungbe'} "not hungry". But if you are hungry first, then you eat enough, then you can say {DaH jIghungHa'} "Now I am un-hungry." (="not hungry any more") It also works with {'oj} the same way. Lieven. _______________________________________________ Tlhingan-hol mailing list Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol [[eof]]